After the COVID-19 pandemic stopped many asylum procedures throughout Europe, fresh technologies have become reviving these systems. From lie detection tools tested at the line to a program for validating documents and transcribes interviews, a wide range of systems is being included in asylum applications. This article explores just how these systems have reshaped the ways asylum procedures will be conducted. That reveals how asylum seekers will be transformed into compelled hindered techno-users: They are asked to conform to a series of techno-bureaucratic steps and also to keep up with capricious tiny within criteria and deadlines. This obstructs their very own capacity to run these devices and to go after their right for cover.
It also illustrates how these technologies will be embedded in refugee governance: They help the ‘circuits of financial-humanitarianism’ that function through a whirlwind of dispersed technological requirements. These requirements increase asylum seekers’ socio-legal precarity simply by hindering all of them from being able to access the programs of coverage. It www.ascella-llc.com/generated-post/ further states that analyses of securitization and victimization should be put together with an insight in to the disciplinary mechanisms worth mentioning technologies, in which migrants will be turned into data-generating subjects who also are self-disciplined by their reliance on technology.
Drawing on Foucault’s notion of power/knowledge and comarcal knowledge, the article states that these solutions have an natural obstructiveness. They have a double effect: while they assist to expedite the asylum method, they also produce it difficult just for refugees to navigate these types of systems. They are simply positioned in a ‘knowledge deficit’ that makes them vulnerable to illegitimate decisions manufactured by non-governmental actors, and ill-informed and unreliable narratives about their conditions. Moreover, they pose new risks of’machine mistakes’ which may result in incorrect or discriminatory outcomes.
